tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7386105208394107344.post4206474078493967911..comments2021-03-24T23:36:03.410-04:00Comments on .Net coding discoveries, focused on reusability: Unit testing referenceSir Richard Hoarehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09089938342974440835noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7386105208394107344.post-6858585095429452512012-10-08T09:35:17.348-04:002012-10-08T09:35:17.348-04:00Thanks Tim, this is based on my notes from a unit ...Thanks Tim, this is based on my notes from a unit testing book, they didn't emphasize it, and I think it should have been =)Sir Richard Hoarehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09089938342974440835noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7386105208394107344.post-91693810472957435752010-10-15T00:12:47.533-04:002010-10-15T00:12:47.533-04:00Great list.
[quote]
- Refactor your code
- [blogg...Great list.<br /><br />[quote]<br />- Refactor your code<br />- [blogger's note: I would run the tests again after the refactoring]<br />[/quote]<br /><br />An absolute must to run the test again after refactoring. Allowing for safe refactoring is one of the reason to write the tests in the first place.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com